PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR IPA MODEL STAD DAN TGT DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS IV SDI MIFTAHUL HUDA

Abstract

This research is motivated by the researcher's interest in analyzing the differences in science learning outcomes based on the treatments given by the researcher, taking into account students' learning styles. The research approach is quantitative with a Quasi-Experimental Design of the Two Group Posttest-Only Group Design. The sample was taken using a saturated sampling technique. The data collection techniques include observation, questionnaires, tests, and documentation. The prerequisite testing stage includes tests for normality and homogeneity. Data analysis uses the Independent Sample t Test, One Way Anova, and Two Way Anova tests. The results of this study are as follows: (1) There is a significant difference in science learning outcomes between students using the models of STAD and TGT. (2) There is a significant difference in science learning outcomes among students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. (3) There is no interaction between the models of STAD and TGT and learning styles in their influence on science learning outcomes. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that the use of learning models and students' learning styles needs to be considered. This is because every student has different learning styles, so the selection of the learning model applied should be taken into account. The TGT model is more effective than STAD in influencing the science learning outcomes of fourth-grade students.